|
Post by broncosrawk on Aug 29, 2006 9:11:33 GMT -5
Not submitting a fix, but hopefully coming to an agreement on one. Aaron Brooks is supremely overrated on '07, and he should be fixed. Not only has he looked horrible in the preseason, the Raiders have gone to sign Jeff George for Christ's sake. Desperate? 84=too high for a miserable QB who would be a backup anywhere besides (and probably will end up) Oakland.
|
|
|
Post by willsey on Aug 29, 2006 11:06:50 GMT -5
Ouch. Brooks is not a HORRIBLE QB, i mean, he wins the occasional game. It's not entirely his fault. When he was in New Orleans he had no help and he just started in Oakland. I'd say give hime a few regular season games and see how he does before chopping his stats.
|
|
|
Post by broncosrawk on Aug 29, 2006 11:09:04 GMT -5
They got JEFF GEORGE, and he really does look bad. Have you seen any of the Raiders games? The Raiders have looked bad, and Brooks has looked worse.
|
|
|
Post by willsey on Aug 29, 2006 11:16:30 GMT -5
Ok, you have a point. Brooks has been pretty bad, and George is ancient, but Brooks has the potential to be a good QB. I still say giving him a chance to prove him self in an important (regular season) game, would be the best way to go.
|
|
|
Post by broncosrawk on Aug 29, 2006 11:29:25 GMT -5
30 years old. Potential no longer matters at that age. He's backup talent at best. For the moment, I'm going to bump down his awareness and accuracy in my game. He is still mobile, I'll give him that.
OVR: 84 -> 79 AWR: 73 -> 65 (perhaps too much?) THA: 81 -> 78
|
|
|
Post by willsey on Aug 29, 2006 11:42:05 GMT -5
His OVerall looks good...his AWR is a little low.
|
|
crich
Practice Squad
Posts: 42
|
Post by crich on Aug 29, 2006 17:36:33 GMT -5
Yeah, that is a little too low. I should be maybe 69. Everything else looks about right.
Their first team looks sloppy, but they still are undefeated (4-0)
|
|
|
Post by Radie on Aug 30, 2006 14:19:46 GMT -5
ok, so is this whaere we are at so far?
OVR: 84 -> 79 AWR: 73 -> 65 (perhaps too much?) THA: 81 -> 78
i wont post it yet. just getting a sense of where we are at in this debate.
|
|
|
Post by broncosrawk on Aug 30, 2006 14:41:27 GMT -5
I think that maybe a 69 AWR and a 75 THA would be better, since people think his AWR was too low with a 65, and he can't get anything to Moss.
|
|
|
Post by ejw325 on Aug 30, 2006 14:44:16 GMT -5
I tend to agreen with around 69 or 70 fow thw AWA attribute. I think 65 is i little too low scale for him.
|
|
|
Post by thefranchisejw on Sept 4, 2006 17:14:24 GMT -5
Aaron Brooks Awr- 70 TA- 78 Ovr- 81
|
|
|
Post by legendary on Sept 4, 2006 18:18:50 GMT -5
After all that, still an 81? I'd consider him a Mike McMahon 78 OVR at best. Anyopne who can only complete one 16 yard pass to Randy "Green 'n' Mean" Moss is pretty freakin' horrible.
|
|
|
Post by broncosrawk on Sept 5, 2006 10:06:45 GMT -5
AWR - 69 THA - 79
That still makes him a 79.
|
|
|
Post by Radie on Sept 5, 2006 10:14:10 GMT -5
i like that alot. he is a 79.
|
|
|
Post by brennerdlinger on Sept 9, 2006 2:47:58 GMT -5
I like 69 AWR 79 THA
|
|