|
|
Post by legendary on Aug 23, 2006 18:01:15 GMT -5
Name: Heath Farwell
Position: ROLB
Number: #59
Team: Minnesota Vikings
College: S.D. State
Height/Weight: 6'0"/235
Age: 24
Years Pro: 1
Hand: Right
Skin: Light
Hair Color: Blonde
Hairstyle: Bald
Tendency: Coverage ROLB
OVR: 77
SPD: 82
STR: 68
AWR: 60
AGI: 81
ACC: 81
CTH: 61
CAR: 53
JMP: 73
BTK: 24
TCK: 83
THP: 12
THA: 12
PBK: 23
RBK: 32
KPW: 15
KAC: 13
KR: 11
STA: 85
INJ: 81
TGH: 84 I have him at ROLB since Chad Greenway got hurt and the next best alternative is Dontarrious Thomas, who is 79 OVR and should be MLB. Farwell is more experienced than Greenway at Special Teams, so I made him an 11 KR. The rest I just shoveled out until it seemed like it would fit for a mainly coverage guy. |
|
|
|
Post by FBGAMERSCOM on Aug 24, 2006 10:06:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by legendary on Aug 25, 2006 21:08:41 GMT -5
They're completely arbitrary with their rankings. For example, they have DeAngelo Hall with only 93 speed when he can run a 4.15 40. Also, they have T.J. Duckett with 88 strength; that's saying he's stronger than uber-man T.O. I'd take what they ahve to say with a grain of extremely small salt.
My ratings are based on the fact that they have gained prominent roles in each team's offense.
|
|
|
|
Post by meltingprism on Aug 26, 2006 1:04:31 GMT -5
Wait a minute you think Terrell Owens is stronger then TJ Duckett? Are you kidding me!? TJ Duckett would flatten TO any day of the week, hence why TO plays WR. The only people weaker then him are the QB and kickers.
|
|
|
|
Post by legendary on Aug 26, 2006 16:55:55 GMT -5
Let me rephrase that by using another player as an example. 88 STR would mean he's stronger than guys like La'Roi Glover, Kevin Williams, and Warren Sapp. Also, you have to consider that the highest STR in 07 is Jamal Lewis at 83, and i think that's a bit of a stretch.
As to T.J. Duckett flattening T.O., I doubt that. T.O. is a jerk, but he's a physical specimen. He has more muscles in his abs than he does brain cells. Physically, he could line up at TE and block linebackers.
But whatever. *shrug*
|
|
|
|
Post by xtremedb on Aug 27, 2006 20:42:10 GMT -5
i think Farwell's tackle rating should be 81 or 82.
|
|
|
|
Post by Radie on Aug 27, 2006 21:45:20 GMT -5
i think Farwell's tackle rating should be 81 or 82. i was thinking along the same line. just not as severe. I was thinking 84 maybe. 89 does seem high. but i will let legendary make the call. |
|
|
|
Post by legendary on Aug 28, 2006 12:27:42 GMT -5
I'll compromise and cut it to 83. That makes his OVR 77.
|
|
|
|
Post by Radie on Aug 29, 2006 2:16:11 GMT -5
updated it
|
|
